BlueNews About Medicare Manage your prescriptions Who’s hot in Medicare Supplement? A growing body of evidence links the prevalence of beneficiary-level social risk factors with performance on measures included in Medicare value-based purchasing programs, including MA and Part D Star Ratings. With support from our contractors, we undertook research to provide scientific evidence as to whether MA organizations or Part D sponsors that enroll a disproportionate number of vulnerable beneficiaries are systematically disadvantaged by the current Star Ratings. In 2014, we issued a Request for Information to gather information directly from organizations to supplement the data that CMS collects, as we believe that plans and sponsors are uniquely positioned to provide both qualitative and quantitative information that is not available from other sources. In February and September 2015, we released details on the findings of our research.[43] We have also reviewed reports about the impact of socio-economic status (SES) on quality ratings, such as the report published by the NQF posted at www.qualityforum.org/​risk_​adjustment_​ses.aspx and the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission's (MedPAC) Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy posted at http://www.medpac.gov/​docs/​default-source/​reports/​march-2016-report-to-the-congress-medicare-payment-policy.pdf?​sfvrsn=​0. We have more recently been reviewing reports prepared by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE [44] ) and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine on the issue of measuring and accounting for social risk factors in CMS' value-based purchasing and quality reporting programs, and we have been considering options on how to address the issue in these programs. On December 21, 2016, ASPE submitted a Report to Congress on a study it was required to conduct under section 2(d) of the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation (IMPACT) Act of 2014. The study analyzed the effects of certain social risk factors of Medicare beneficiaries on quality measures and measures of resource use in nine Medicare value-based purchasing programs. The report also included considerations for strategies to account for social risk factors in these programs. A January 10, 2017 report released by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine provided various potential methods for measuring and accounting for social risk factors, including stratified public reporting.[45] (i) Improvement measures receive the highest weight of 5. Although the language at § 423.120(a)(3) is specific to non-retail pharmacies, there is a great deal of confusion regarding mail-order pharmacy in the Part D marketplace. We believe it is inappropriate to classify pharmacies as “mail-order pharmacies” solely on the basis that they offer home delivery by mail. Because the statute at section 1860D-4(b)(1)(D) of the Act discusses cost sharing in terms of mail order versus other non-retail pharmacies, mail-order cost sharing is unique to mail-order pharmacies, as we have proposed to define the term. For example, while a non-retail home infusion pharmacy may provide services by mail, cost-sharing is commensurate with retail cost-sharing. Therefore, to clarify what a mail-order pharmacy is, we propose to define mail-order pharmacy at § 423.100 as a licensed pharmacy that dispenses and delivers extended days' supplies of covered Part D drugs via common carrier at mail-order cost sharing. SUMMARY OF BENEFITS Conservation Improvement Programs 16. Section 422.101 is amended by revising paragraphs (d)(2) and (3) to read as follows: (i) A provisional supply coverage period during which the sponsor must cover all drugs dispensed to the beneficiary in accordance with prescriptions written by the individual on the preclusion list. The provisional supply period begins on the date-of-service the first drug is dispensed in accordance with a prescription written by the individual on the preclusion list.

Call 612-324-8001

The Chief Actuary of the CMS must provide accounting information and cost-projections to the Medicare Board of Trustees to assist them in assessing the program's financial health. The Board is required by law to issue annual reports on the financial status of the Medicare Trust Funds, and those reports are required to contain a statement of actuarial opinion by the Chief Actuary.[14][15] Section 1860D-4(c)(5)(B)(iv)(II) of the Act explicitly provides for an exception to the required timeframe for issuing a second notice. Specifically, the statute permits the Secretary to identify through rulemaking concerns regarding the health or safety of a beneficiary or significant drug diversion activities that would necessitate that a Part D sponsor provide the second written notice to the beneficiary before the 30 day time period normally required has elapsed. For this reason, we included the language, “subject to paragraph (ii),” at the beginning of proposed § 423.153(f)(8)(i).Start Printed Page 56354 We propose to revise § 422.310 to add a new paragraph (d)(5) to require that, for data described in paragraph (d)(1) as data equivalent to Medicare fee-for-service data (which is also known as MA encounter data), MA organizations must submit a National Provider Identifier in a Billing Provider field on each MA encounter data record, per CMS guidance. Labor Market & Economic Data Other Government Sites (A) Prescribed for the beneficiary by one or more prescribers;Start Printed Page 56511 Los Angeles, CA Shopping Cart 17. Expedited Substitutions of Certain Generics and Other Midyear Formulary Changes (§§ 423.100, 423.120, and 423.128) How do I update my address with People First? Consistent with current policy, we propose at §§ 422.166(g) and 423.186(g) a hold harmless provision for the inclusion or exclusion of the improvement measure(s) for highly-rated contracts' highest ratings. We are proposing, in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (iii), a series of rules that specify when the improvement measure is included in calculating overall and summary ratings. MomsRising.org Español DATES: The Masthead Centers for Medicare and Medicaid ... 12. ICRs Related to Preclusion List Requirements for Prescribers in Part D and Individuals and Entities in Medicare Advantage, Cost Plans and PACE Consumer Quoting (h) * * * Can I add Medigap after leaving a Medicare Advantage plan? ++ Impact on burden due to increased adoption of electronic health record systems. In considering this alternative, we contemplated adding additional beneficiary protections, including the issuance of an additional notice to ensure that individuals understood the implication of taking no action. While this alternative would have led to increased use of the seamless conversion enrollment mechanism than what had been used in the past, the operational challenges, particularly in relation to the new Medicare Beneficiary Identification number may be significant for MA organizations to overcome at this time. Attend a Presentation 115. The authority citation for part 460 continues to read as follows: X-rays Jump up ^ Kasperowicz, Pete (March 27, 2014). "House approves 'doc fix' in voice vote". The Hill. Retrieved March 27, 2014. 1850 M Street NW 3 Expenses That Will Probably Increase Once You Retire Many of the country’s leading insurance companies are expanding their options in areas that currently have Medicare Cost Plans. During this year’s annual enrollment period, you’ll likely see additional Medicare plans from existing companies and offerings for plans from companies that are new to your area. Select an audience to restrict the search Top Workplaces Ad Choice Net Annualized Monetized Savings 82.34 82.02 CYs 2019-2023 Federal government, MA organizations and Part D Sponsors. § 423.582 Special Expertise Panels 4. Physician Incentive Plans—Update Stop-Loss Protection Requirements (§ 422.208) Manage everything right here Medicare Part B premiums are commonly deducted automatically from beneficiaries' monthly Social Security checks. They can also be paid quarterly via bill sent directly to beneficiaries. This alternative is becoming more common because whereas the eligibility age for Medicare has remained at 65 per the 1965 legislation, the so-called Full Retirement Age for Social Security has been increased to 66 and will go even higher over time. Therefore, many people delay collecting Social Security and have to pay their Part B premium directly. Drug Plan Customer Service. Footer Navigation Federal Relay Service ^ Jump up to: a b Rice, Thomas; Desmond, Katherine; Gabel, Jon (Fall 1990). "The Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act: a Post-mortem" (PDF). Health Affairs. 9 (3): 75–87. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.9.3.75. In paragraph (iv), we propose that with respect to requests for reimbursement submitted by Medicare beneficiaries, a Part D sponsor may not make payment to a beneficiary dependent upon the sponsor's acquisition of an active and valid individual prescriber NPI, unless there is an indication of fraud. If the sponsor is unable to retrospectively acquire an active and valid individual prescriber NPI, the sponsor may not seek recovery of any payment to the beneficiary solely on that basis. BROKERS Get a Quote Find, compare and enroll in a Medicare plan from Blue Cross. Medicare Dental Coverage The U.S. approach to trade negotiation misunderstands modern China. Catering Recipients of adoption or foster care assistance under Title IV of the Social Security Act In reviewing section 1854(h) of the Social Security Act and Medicare Advantage (MA) regulations governing plan segments, we have determined that the statute and existing regulations may be interpreted to allow MA plans to vary supplemental benefits, in addition to premium and cost sharing, by segment, as long as the benefits, premium, and cost sharing are uniform within each segment of an MA plan's service area. Plans segments are county-level portions of a plan's overall service area which, under current CMS policy, are permitted to have different premiums and cost sharing amounts as long as these premiums and cost sharing amounts are uniform throughout the segment. We are proposing to revise our interpretation of the existing statute and regulations to allow MA plan segments to vary by benefits in addition to premium and cost sharing, consistent with the MA regulatory requirements defining segments at § 422.262(c)(2). Not registered? Medicare & You Handbook Dental Blue for Individuals During June, his coverage starts July 1 (but not before his Part A and/or B) C. J Homeland Security Department 17 8 (2) Proposed Requirements for Part D Drug Management Programs (§§ 423.100 and 423.153) l. Measure-Level Star Ratings Dental Online Services We are also proposing at § 423.578(a)(6)(i) to codify that plans are not required to offer tiering exceptions for brand name drugs or biological products at the cost-sharing level of alternative drug(s) for treating the enrollee's condition, where the alternatives include only the following drug types: Employee Engagement Survey Certain vaccinations Table 12—MLR Reporting for Fully Credible, Partially Credible, and Non-Credible Contracts National Health Care Reform Join/Renew Today Confirm your Special Enrollment Period 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. S M T W T F S Telehealth New low-cost short-term medical plans are available We propose to modify the definition of generic drug at § 423.4 as follows: Call 612-324-8001 CMS | Minneapolis Minnesota MN 55422 Hennepin Call 612-324-8001 CMS | Minneapolis Minnesota MN 55423 Hennepin Call 612-324-8001 CMS | Minneapolis Minnesota MN 55424 Hennepin
Legal | Sitemap